Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Herald (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete G3, obvious vandalism. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Herald (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No ghits or google news results for this apparently highly controversial yet commercially successful album. No appearances in the music review sites that panned it so critically, the second worst reviewed album at metacritic is something called 'Hefty Fine by Bloodhound Gang' and not this album as claimed. Nothing to support the existence of this song, fails WP:V and is quite possibly an outright hoax and written as an attack on or to otherwise disparage Travis Barker. Benea (talk) 07:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An obvious hoax. –Merqurial (talk) 07:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoax, possible speedy per G3. Pmlineditor Talk 09:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article is factually accurate and representitive of the album recently released —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlb1000 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC) — Tlb1000 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Do Not Delete I personally think the aricle should be left as it is for a while. I have heard of this before and think the article should be left in place. Boxcar90 (talk) 11:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC) — Boxcar90 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep I agree with Boxcar - Ret.Prof (talk) 12:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 12:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an obvious hoax. Several of the review links are to Hybrid Theory reviews. Also, if the album was so commercially successful, I'm sure it would have some coverage in news artcles. It has none. In addition, the arguments by Boxcar and Tlb1000, both of which appear to be single purpose accounts controlled by the same person, are not valid, and I'm sure the closing admin will disregard them. Tim meh (review me) 15:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.